Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Meyer

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided March 3, 1937PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

The issue in this proceeding to finally fix and compromise the tax pursuant to section 233 of the Tax Law, on the contingent remainder interests in this estate, resolves itself into the narrow question of whether or not Alfred H. Nollman, who is named as the primary income beneficiary under the trust erected by the “ Sixteenth ” item of the will, received a vested interest in the remainder.

The duration of the trust is measured by the lives of Alfred H. Nollman and William B. Nollman, with the further limitation that *427it shall not, in any event, continue beyond the 4th day of May,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Robinson v. . MartinNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. In Re the Final Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of WellsNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. In re Brooklyn Trust Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 1929
  4. In Re the Accounting of Brooklyn Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
  5. In re the Estate of WeissmannNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of DenariNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  2. In re the Estate of TalbotNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
  3. In re the Construction of the Will of BehnNew York Surrogate's Court · 1951
  4. In re the Estate of BatesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
  5. In re the Estate of BattellNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API