Legal Opinion
Jackson v. United States
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided February 21, 2001No. Crim. 95-50029PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
GADOLA, District Judge.
Before the Court are Petitioner’s motions to (a) amend his petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (docket entry 150) and (b) vacate his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (docket entry 123). Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(e)(2), this Court has determined that a hearing would not aid in the disposition of these motions. For the reasons stated below, the Court grants Petitioner’s motion to amend his petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and denies Petitioner’s motion to vacate his sentence pursuant 28 U.S.C. § 2255.
I BACKGROUND
On June 19, 1996, a jury convicted…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Daniels v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Kevin Antonio Goode v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Anderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Wilkerson v. JonesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
- Jackson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.