Legal Opinion
Daniels v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 25, 2001No. 00-6298PublishedCited by 95 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
Steve Alan Daniels requests leave to file an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, arguing the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), renders his sentence unconstitutional. Because Mr. Daniels has filed previous applications for habeas relief, we construed his motion as a request to file a second or successive application. We initially consolidated his pro se application with that of Edwin Browning, another prisoner seeking permission to file a second or successive…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- Chester McCoy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Juan Sanchez-Cervantes, AKA Hugo Quirox, Quiroc, Quiroz, Quiroz Trejo, and Quiroz TapiaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Case v. HatchCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Wilson v. SirmonsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Getsy v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.