Legal Opinion
McCrory v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided December 15, 1982No. 68864PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLINTON, Judge.
In his second ground of error, the appellant contends it was error to admit his oral statement of June 12, 1978, to John T. Holbrook, which was the “result of custodial interrogation.” Finding merit in this contention, we are constrained to reverse.
An oral statement made by an accused as a result of custodial interrogation between August 29, 1977 and August 31, 1981, is admissible only for impeachment purposes and only when the statement is shown to comply with the version of Article 38.22, § 3(a) and (b) which was in effect. The State, however, does not contend…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Wyrick v. FieldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Cooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Shiflet v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Meek v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Alvarado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Cantu v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.