Legal Opinion

Black Eagle Oil Co. v. Belcher

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 10, 1913No. Civ. No. 1342PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County and from an order refusing a new trial. J. W. Mahon, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Kaye & Siemon, R. H. Cross, and Arthur H. Brandt, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

Action to quiet title. Judgment against plaintiff, from which, and an order denying its motion for a new trial, it appeals. The land involved is the south V2 of the northeast % of section 34, township 12 north, range 23 west, S. B. M., in Kern County. It was stipulated that prior to July 27, 1906, the ownership of the entire northeast % of said section 34 was vested in defendant S. E. Belcher. Plaintiff then introduced in evidence the record of a grant deed executed by S. E. Belcher, dated March 9, 1910, recorded April 5, 1910, which purported to convey the land described in the complaint to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kenniff v. CaulfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Eversdon v. MayhewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Long v. DollarhideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Scott v. UmbargerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Adams Oil & Gas Co. v. HudsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. United States v. Certain Parcels of Land SituateDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1949
  3. Estate of LissnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Bertelsen v. BertelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Bridges v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API