People v. Pedraza
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed. It is clear from this record that the sentencing court did consider "the nature and circumstances of the crime and * * * the history and character of the defendant” (Penal Law § 70.02 [2] [c] [i]), correctly including whether, in view of defendant’s physical condition, a sentence of imprisonment would be "unduly harsh”. Thus, it cannot be said that the court failed to exercise its discretion or abused that discretion as a matter of law.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander and Titone.
2Cited by18 opinions
- People v. MorinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. TweedyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- People v. BovaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- People v. BusseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.