Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Rush

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 10, 1989No. 42 E.D. Appeal Dkt. 1988PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIX, Chief Justice.

After a bench trial, Derrick Rush was convicted of aggravated assault, criminal conspiracy, reckless endangerment, possession of an instrument of crime and a violation of the Uniform Firearms Act. He was sentenced by the Honorable Sandra Mazer Moss to five to ten years’ imprisonment, consistent with the prescribed mandatory minimum sentencing for crimes committed with a handgun, and a consecutive five-year period of probation.

Appellant challenges his conviction and judgment of sentence on two grounds: that he was improperly certified for trial as an adult; and, that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Commonwealth v. StanleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Commonwealth v. SextonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Commonwealth v. CornishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. GreinerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Lawrence Lines v. David Larkins, Warden the District Attorney of the County of Bucks the Attorney General of the State of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  2. Commonwealth v. Batts, Q., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Commonwealth v. TilghmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Commonwealth v. CarterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Commonwealth v. TraversSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API