Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Sexton

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 1, 1979No. 736PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

NIX, Justice.

The pivotal issue in this case is whether an identification made during a certification hearing1 should be excluded because of the court’s denial of a prior request by the defense for a pre-hearing lineup. We granted the Commonwealth’s request for review to answer the difficult question as to under what circumstances, if any, an accused is entitled to a pre-hearing lineup, and the subsidiary question in the event that there are circumstances when such lineups are required upon demand, the remedy for failing to accede to such request.

The Commonwealth’s evidence…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Commonwealth v. MusiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Solano, R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Commonwealth v. RansomeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API