Legal Opinion
Everts v. Newhouse Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 15, 1938No. Civ. No. 11542PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.
Plaintiff acquired ownership of a $4,741 note and trust deed which had been executed by defendant on February 21, 1934. On July 9, 1935, a notice of default under the trust deed was recorded, and on November 8, 1935, the real property was sold under the terms of the trust deed, leaving a deficiency of $2,252.65.
On June 6, 1936, an action was commenced in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County to recover the deficiency. Defendant answered, setting up as an affirmative defense that the amended complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against it for the reason…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bakersfield Home Building Co. v. J. K. McAlpine Land & Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
- Harris v. FittingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ware v. HellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Massey-Ferguson Credit Corp. v. CasaulongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- San Francisco Bank v. St. ClairCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Glashoff v. GlashoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Rust v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941