Legal Opinion

Beastie Boys v. Monster Energy Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 4, 2013No. 12 Civ. 6065(PAE)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge:

This case involves claims by the Beastie Boys, the hip-hop group, against Monster Energy Company (“Monster”), the energy-drink company. Specifically, the Beastie Boys, along with affiliated plaintiffs,1 bring claims of copyright infringement and of violations of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1051 et seq., and the New York Civil Rights Law (NYCRL) § 51, arising out of Monster’s allegedly unauthorized publication of a promotional video that used as its soundtrack a remix including songs originally composed and recorded by the Beastie Boys.

*341At issue…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Wright v. GoordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  4. Holcomb v. Iona CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  5. Terry v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Beastie Boys v. Monster Energy Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  2. Beastie Boys v. Monster Energy Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  3. Jackson v. OdenatDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  4. Beastie Boys v. Monster Energy Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  5. Baker v. WeberDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API