Legal Opinion
Beastie Boys v. Monster Energy Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 18, 2014No. 12 Civ. 6065 (PAE)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge:
Trial in this case is scheduled to begin April 21, 2014. This decision resolves outstanding motions: (1) a motion in limine by defendant Monster Energy Company (“Monster”) to preclude plaintiffs (the “Beastie Boys”) from offering evidence of two sets of violations by Monster or athletes affiliated with Monster of the Beastie Boys’ copyright interests, which violations he outside the scope of the allegations in this ease, Dkt. 66; (2) a motion by the Beastie Boys for leave to file an Amended Complaint, Dkt. 72; and (3) a motion in limine by the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Kassner v. 2nd Avenue Delicatessen Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. Sunny Merchandise Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- LVL XIII Brands, Inc. v. Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Coty Inc. v. Excell Brands, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Hart v. RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Beastie Boys v. Monster Energy Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.