Kay v. Frick
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment of the County Court of Nassau county modified by reducing recovery to $105.16; and as so modified unanimously affirmed, without costs. We are of opinion that the testimony of plaintiff at folios 65-67 of the record established a locus pcenitentiai for the defendant, and barred plaintiff from recovering damages for wrongful discharge. (Heiferman v. Greenhut Cloak Co., 143 N. Y. Supp. 411; affd., 163 App. Div. 939; Connell v. Averill, 8 id. 524.)
Present — Kelly, P. J., Rich, Manning, Kelby and Kapper, JJ.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Heiferman v. Greenhut Cloak Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- Heiferman v. Greenhut Cloak Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1913
3Cited by3 opinions
- Karas v. H. R. Laboratories, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
- Karas v. H. R. Laboratories, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
- Teich v. Aetna Industrial Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959