Heiferman v. Greenhut Cloak Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Term, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 30th day of December, 1913, reversing an order of the City Court setting aside a verdict and granting a new-trial, and from an order of the City Court entered upon such determination.
1Per curiam
We think the order of the trial judge setting aside the verdict and granting a new trial was under the circumstances proper and that such order should not have been reversed. The determination of the Appellate Term and the order of the City Court thereupon entered are, therefore, reversed, with costs in this court and- in the Appellate Term, and the original order of the City Court affirmed. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. Determination and order entered thereon reversed, with costs in this court and the Appellate Term, and original order of the City…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Kay v. FrickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Teich v. Aetna Industrial Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1958
- Karas v. H. R. Laboratories, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
- Teich v. Aetna Industrial Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959