Legal Opinion

Heiferman v. Greenhut Cloak Co.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided June 15, 1913PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action by Frank Heiferman against the Greenhut Cloak Company. Verdict for plaintiff, ^nd defendant moves for new trial. Motion granted.

1Opinion of the CourtFinelite, J.

This action is brought to recover damages for an alleged wrongful discharge.

The plaintiff and defendant entered into articles of agreement, dated the 18th day of July, 1911, wherein the defendant agreed to employ the plaintiff as a designer and general superintendent in the cloak and suit business that the defendant was trading in and manufacturing, for a period of one year from October 15, 1911, till the 15th of October, 1912, at a yearly salary of $7,000, payable in weekly installments of $134.62.

The plaintiff entered the employ of the defendant at his place of business in the city of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Birdsong v. EllisMississippi Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Levin v. Standard Fashion Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1890
  3. Ruland v. Waukesha Water Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  4. Pindar v. JenkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  5. Kune v. Fitzgerald Bros. Brewing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ingrassia v. Shell Oil CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
  2. Kay v. FrickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API