Legal Opinion

Christopher L. Bauer v. Varity Dayton-Walther Corporation, Formerly Dayton-Walther Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 8, 1997No. 96-5603PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOGGS, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff below, Christopher Bauer, appeals the district court’s award of summary judgment to his former employer, Varity Dayton-Walther Corporation (‘Varity”), on his claim brought under the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm.

I

Bauer began working for Varity on April 27,1992. He was assigned shifts that included both weekends and ten-hour days, and he sometimes worked fifty-five-hour weeks. Bauer’s employment with Varity was governed by his union’s collective bargaining agreement,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. David Foster and Catherine Foster v. Sigmund Barilow and Margaret BarilowCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  4. Health Insurance Ass'n of America, Inc. v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  5. Robbins v. Bureau of Nat. Affairs, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1995

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Gale Edgar v. Jac Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  2. Philip R. Plant v. Morton International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  3. Jeffrey Perry v. Jaguar of Troy, Assumed Name for Somerset Auto Collection, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  4. Jack M. Haefling v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  5. Robert Dan Orr v. Kathleen M. HawkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API