Legal Opinion
Jack M. Haefling v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 4, 1999No. 97-1658PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KANNE, Circuit Judge.
United Parcel Service (“UPS”) terminated Jack Haefling’s employment for poor attendance. Haefling filed suit against UPS alleging that his termination violated the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA” or “Act”), and UPS moved for summary judgment. The district court granted this motion based on the court’s conclusion that the undisputed facts failed to establish that Haefling “suffered from a serious medical condition” or that his condition rendered him “unable to perform the functions of his position” with UPS, as required by the FMLA. Because we agree with the district…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Hodgens v. General Dynamics Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Peter H. Bombard v. Fort Wayne Newspapers, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Elizabeth C.O. Bellaver v. Quanex Corp./nichols-HomeshieldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- James Hansen v. Fincantieri Marine Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Bruce K. Cable, as Debtor in Possession v. Ivy Tech State CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Donna Feldman v. American Memorial Life Insurance Company, Formerly Known as Prairie States Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Robert Tutman v. Wbbm-Tv, Inc./cbs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.