Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 7, 1984No. CX-84-225PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIERENGARTEN, Judge.

Appellant Robert Thomas’ conviction for a sale of a controlled substance, assault in the second degree and obstructing legal process or arrest, arose out of a controlled sale of cocaine to an undercover state narcotics agent. Thomas claims the evidence was insufficient to support the assault conviction. He also raises sentencing questions, namely, that he was sentenced twice for a single behavioral incident and erroneously assigned a criminal history score point under the Hernandez method. We affirm.

FACTS

State BCA narcotics agents, Greg Hopps and Douglas Partyka,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. State v. PieschkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. State v. HernandezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. State v. HardimonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. State v. EngholmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. FischerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  2. State v. MarchbanksCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  3. State v. KastnerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  4. In re the Welfare of D.A.H.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API