Legal Opinion

McConnell v. Lancaster Brothers

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1931PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swiggart

This is á suit for compensation for the death of Monroe McConnell, an employe of the defendants, Lancaster Brothers. Compensation was denied by the circuit judge, on the ground that the accidental death of the employe did not .arise out of his employment. To review this action the appeal is prosecuted by petitioner, widow of the deceased employe.

There is no conflict in the evidence. McConnell was sent to the near-by business house of the Byrd Motor Company, to borrow a tool for his employer. While engaged in this errand, one Carter, who had no interest in or connection with the' errand of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hendrix v. Franklin State BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Early Stratton Co. v. RollisonTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Chamber of Commerce v. TurnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Thornton v. RCA Service Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Reed v. SensenbaughMissouri Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. Service Mut. Ins. Co. of Texas v. VaughnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  4. Forbess v. StarnesTennessee Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Kinkead v. Holliston MillsTennessee Supreme Court · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API