Norvell v. Oury
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Bexar.
1Opinion of the CourtLipscomb, J.
This suit was brought on a promissory note made by the defendant, payable to the plaintiff. The defence set up against the note was that it was given on a gambling consideration for money won at cards, and there was a verdict and judgment for the defendant.
The first error assigned, is the ruling of the Court in refusing to permit the plaintiff to read a deposition of a witness taken at the instance of the defendant. The bill of exceptions shows that the deposition was taken without any cross-interrogatories, bnt that the deposition was filed among the papers ef the suit. Art. 731 (Hart. Dig.)…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Seeligson v. Lewis & WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Texas Banking & Insurance v. StoneTexas Supreme Court · 1878
- Ayers v. HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Monroe v. SmellyTexas Supreme Court · 1860
- Smith v. Central Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.