Monroe v. Smelly
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Houston. Tried below before the Hon. R. A. Reeves. See the opinion for the facts.
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
This suit was instituted by the appellant against the appellees, upon a promissory note for one thousand and fifty dollars, given by the appellees to one Robert Hale, and transferred by Hale, after maturity, to the appellant. The defendants in the court below pleaded that the note was given for money won at a game called “ten pins.” The evidence fully sustained the plea, and the presiding judge instructed the jury as follows: “If the jury believe from the evidence that the note read in evidence was given for money bet and lost at a game of ten pins, it cannot be collected by law.”
The only…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. CroteauSupreme Court of Vermont · 1849
- Norvell v. OuryTexas Supreme Court · 1854
- Pritchet v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1803
- Collamer v. DaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1829
- Conner v. MackeyTexas Supreme Court · 1858
3Cited by8 opinions
- Comer v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Campbell v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893
- Pate v. Wilson Bros. Mercantile Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Himmelman v. PecautSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Zielinski v. HernigCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.