Legal Opinion
Rahman v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 15, 2019No. 17-CM-1293PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ferren, Senior Judge:
Appellant Jalil Rahman appeals his conviction for unlawful entry in violation of D.C. Code § 22-3302 (2012 Repl.) on two grounds: (1) the trial court erred in denying his motion under the Jencks Act1 to require the government to produce a report prepared by a special police officer ("SPO") or, alternatively, to strike the SPO's testimony; and (2) there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction. We affirm.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
At approximately 1:30 a.m. on February 2, 2017, appellant entered a McDonald's restaurant located in the District of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jencks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. AugenblickSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. Carlton E. Bryant, United States of America v. William E. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Rivas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cox v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024
- Hinton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2026
- Lee v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2022
- Nijae Odumn v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020
- Torney v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.