Legal Opinion

Microchip Technology Incorporated v. Aptiv Services US LLC

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided September 9, 2022No. 1:17-cv-01194Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INC., Case No. 1:17-cv-01194-JDW , v. APTIV SERVICES US, LLC, . MEMORANDUM Aptiv Services US, LLC and Microchip Technology Incorporated presented conflicting testimony to a jury about whether Aptiv’s Dual Role Hub infringes Microchip’s

U.S. Patent No. 7,523,243. The jury decided that the Dual Role Hub does not infringe. Microchip now wants to do it all over again. But none of the issues it raises warrants a new trial, so the jury verdict will stand, and the Court will deny its motion. I. BACKGROUND Microchip…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
  3. United States v. Sineneng-SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  4. Andrew Leonard v. Stemtech International IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  5. Norwilton Murray v. Fairbanks Morse, Beloit Power Systems, Inc., in No. 78-2224. Cross Appeal of Norwilton Murray, in No. 78-2225Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API