Legal Opinion
City of Burbank, California v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided December 17, 2001No. 01-5004PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.
The Plaintiff-Appellant, the City of Burbank, California (“Burbank”), seeks review of the final decision by the U.S. Court of Federal Claims (“Court of Federal Claims” or “trial court”) dismissing Burbank’s complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Burbank filed suit against the United States, acting by and through the Bonneville Power Administration (“BPA” or “Bonneville”), in the Court of Federal Claims under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(1), alleging two counts of breach of contract. The trial court dismissed both counts, holding that they fall within…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- William M. Hanlin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Ronald G. Meeks, Claimant-Appellant v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Public Utility District No. 1 of Clark County v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Arthur Perez v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- City of Seattle v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Boston Edison Co. v. StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Southern California Edison v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Pseg Nuclear, l.l.c. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Nebraska Public Power District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.