Legal Opinion
William M. Hanlin v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 2, 2000No. 99-5062PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PLAGER, Circuit Judge.
William M. Hanlin appeals from a decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims dismissing his complaint against the United States (“Government”) for lack of jurisdiction. See Hanlin v. United States, 43 Fed. Cl. 34 (1999). The Court of Federal Claims held that it did not have jurisdiction over Mr. Hanlin’s claim for breach of an implied contract because the claim was exclusively within the jurisdiction of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs (“Secretary”) pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 511(a) (1994). Because the Court of Federal Claims has jurisdiction over Mr. Hanlin’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Traynor v. TurnageSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Hugh D. Cox v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Gould, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Debra J. Todd v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Jimmie Ann Taylor, Ladell Vasicek, Noma Chriss, Martha Cole, and Sara M. McCarthy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Veterans for Common Sense v. ShinsekiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Vietnam Veterans of America v. ShinsekiCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- William M. Hanlin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Gravatt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.