Legal Opinion

Contrera v. Langer

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided March 5, 2018No. 16 Civ. 3851 (LTS) (GWG)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiffs Usvaldo Contrera, Francisco Lopez, Pedro Batista, Fabian Herrera, and Antonio Reyes-superintendents, handymen, and a porter at residential buildings in Upper Manhattan and the Bronx-filed this action against various individuals and entities that plaintiffs collectively refer to as "the E & M Enterprise" alleging that this enterprise employed plaintiffs. Plaintiffs make claims against the E & M Enterprise under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. ("FLSA"), and several provisions of the New York Labor Law, N.Y.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Staehr v. Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  5. Wagner & Wagner, LLP v. Atkinson, Haskins, Nellis, Brittingham, Gladd & Carwile, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Contrera v. LangerDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  2. Garcia v. 2390 C LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
  3. Gomez v. Epic Landscape Productions, L.C.District Court, D. Kansas · 2025
  4. In re Xunlei Limited Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019
  5. Jones v. Mercedes Benz Manhattan, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API