Legal Opinion

State Highway Commission v. Jones

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1964PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

This is an action to acquire land by condemnation for highway purposes. Plaintiff, the State of Oregon, appeals from a judgment entered on a verdict for defendants in the amount of $43,565.

The first assignment of error is based upon the trial court’s refusal to sustain an objection to the admission of testimony of Peter Bateman given in support of the estimated value of defendants’ land. Bateman was allowed to testify to the demand for gravel material and its price per yard. Another witness testified that the land taken by the state contained approximately 467,000 cubic yards of gravel. Thus…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Highway Commission v. NunesOregon Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. BALTIMORE CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE v. SchreiberCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  2. State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Nevada Aggregates & Asphalt Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State Highway Commission v. Empire Building Material Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  4. State Highway Commission v. AndereggOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  5. West Virginia Department of Highways v. Mountain Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API