State Highway Commission v. Anderegg
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.
Plaintiff, State of Oregon through its Highway Commission, condemned defendants’ land for highway purposes. Plaintiff, in its complaint, alleged the value of the property to be $10,844. The jury returned a verdict of $13,650. The defendant moved to set aside the verdict and for a new trial which motion the court granted, and plaintiff appealed.
One ground for the motion is that the trial judge instructed the jury that the verdict could not be less than $10,844, the sum the State alleged as being its value, when the State’s sole value witness testified the property’s value was $13,000. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Belton v. BuesingOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- City of Dallas v. MalloyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
- Wayland v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- State Tax Commission v. Consumers' Heating Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1956
- Bergen County Sewer Authority v. Borough of Little FerryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Davidson v. Oregon Government Ethics CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Olson v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Hetherington Letter Co. v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- City of Detroit v. YellenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- Culver v. Commonwealth, Department of HighwaysCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.