Legal Opinion

Grimes v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided April 22, 1930No. 4 Div. 583PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRICKEN, P. X

This appellant was charged by indictment with the offense of violating the Prohibition Law (Code 1923, § 4015 et seq., as amended), and upon the trial the state’s evidence tended to show that the searching officers found a small quantity of rum in a jug in defendant’s home. The defendant and his several witnesses testified that the jug in question had been used to contain vinegar and that the contents in the jug when found by the officers was water placed in there by the small daughter of the defendant. Rum is a prohibited liquor; this is judicially known; and if the jug in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Driver v. PateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Holladay v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  3. Taylor v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
  4. Lakey v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
  5. Commonwealth v. PezznerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Racine v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  2. Whitman v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1960
  3. Dortch v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1961
  4. Hill v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1936
  5. Grimes v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API