Legal Opinion

Hill v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided January 14, 1936No. 6 Div. 884PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

Upon the trial of this case in the court below, appellant was convicted of the offense of murder in the second degree, and appeals.

In briefs of counsel for the respective parties, it is agreed that “the statement of facts,” contained in appellant’s brief, are substantially correct. These facts, as developed upon the trial of this case, in the court below, are as follows:

Defendant, appellant, was tried on an indictment for murder in the first degree, for the killing of James Morgan Brooks, alias Buck Brooks, by shooting him with a gun.

Defendant, crippled in his lower…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Carroll v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
  2. Blount v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1873
  3. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  4. Booth v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. McDonald v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. Lawrence v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API