Grimes v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBricken, P. J.
This court en banc has read and considered the evidence in this case, and has reached tbe conclusion that such evidence is not sufficient to justify á verdict of guilt. The court erred to a reversal in holding otherwise. Hackworth v. State, 19 Ala. App. 682, 96 So. 941; Huckabaa v. State, 23 Ala. App. 333, 125 So. 202; McKinnon v. State, 22 Ala. App. 654, 119 So. 596; Clayton v. State, 22 Ala. App. 276, 114 So. 787; Vinson v. State, 22 Ala. App. 112; 113 So. 86; Coggins v. State, 23 Ala. App. 135, 122 So. 186.
Tbe judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken is reversed, and the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Huckabaa v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929
- Clayton v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1927
- Coggin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929
- Grimes v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1930
- McKinnon v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.