Legal Opinion
Raynor v. Raynor
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 19, 1951PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Defendant’s remarriage, with its attendant additional obligations, is not such a change in circumstances as to justify a reduction of the amount of alimony. (Goldberg v. Goldberg, 265 App. Div. 946; Withowski v. Withowski, 271 App. Div. 901, affd. 297 N. Y. 626.) Appeal from order dated September 18, 1950, dismissed, without costs. Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and MacCrate, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Goldberg v. GoldbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dominick v. DominickNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Balmer v. BalmerNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- Zoro ex rel. Lino v. LinoNew York City Family Court · 1972
- Monfette v. Van SickleNew York City Family Court · 1973