Legal Opinion

Goldberg v. Goldberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 14, 1942PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The learned justice at Special Term exercised improperly the discretion vested in him in reducing the alimony. The defendant is shown to earn approximately twenty-five dollars per week. Under all the circumstances disclosed in the record, eight dollars thereof is a fair portion to be paid to the plaintiff. It is immaterial that as an incident to his second marriage, in violation of the decree herein, expense has been incurred by the defendant for the support and hospitalization of his present wife. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dominick v. DominickNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Balmer v. BalmerNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Zoro ex rel. Lino v. LinoNew York City Family Court · 1972
  4. Raynor v. RaynorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  5. Monfette v. Van SickleNew York City Family Court · 1973