Legal Opinion
Balmer v. Balmer
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 10, 1958PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Frank E. Johnson, Official Beferee.
Testimony has been taken under the order to hear and determine the plaintiff’s application for an increase in alimony.
The divorce judgment obtained by her against defendant about 17 years ago, on default, fixed alimony at $17 a week, ydlich probably was a fair reflection of his then ability to pay.
*227He thereafter, without permission from this court, married his present wife, but in Connecticut; he has since the time of the divorce been much more successful in business than in 1941, In 1957 the “ return ” that he and his wife made shows a gross income, salary…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Harris v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Parker v. ParkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- Goldberg v. GoldbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
- Raynor v. RaynorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- Baxter v. BaxterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Zoro ex rel. Lino v. LinoNew York City Family Court · 1972
- Damsey v. DamseyNew York Supreme Court · 1963
- Balmer v. BalmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
- Monfette v. Van SickleNew York City Family Court · 1973
- Dan v. DanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2014