Legal Opinion

Hinds v. Fine

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 25, 1947No. 36,708PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This action was commenced in the city court of Wichita to recover judgment for $820 under the terms of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1944. Judgment was for plaintiffs. The defendant has appealed.

The petition in the city court first pleaded section. 205 (e) of the Emergency Price Control Act (56 Stat. 23, as amended by 58 Stat. 632; 50 U. S. C. App. § 925 [e]). The action was brought pursuant to the act, which, among other things, provided that where any. person violated a price schedule providing a maximum charge the buyer might bring an…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Robb v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. United States v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Hopkins v. . BarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. Kansas Pacific Rly. Co. v. MowerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  5. McCracken v. WrightSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pinkerton v. SchwiethaleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  2. Rojas v. KimbleArizona Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Smith v. BashamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  4. Gotheridge v. BethurumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API