Legal Opinion

Curtis R. Francis v. Danny Horton and Deborah Ford

Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)

Decided March 5, 2009No. 02-08-00328-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-08-328-CV

CURTIS R. FRANCIS APPELLANT

V

DANNY HORTON APPELLEES

AND DEBORAH FORD

------------

FROM THE 30TH DISTRICT COURT OF WICHITA COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]

------------

Introduction

Appellant Curtis R. Francis appeals the trial court=s order granting the summary judgment motion of appellees Danny Horton and Deborah Ford. In two related issues,[2] appellant asserts that the trial court erred by granting appellees= motion because the motion did not relate to the legal theories he had pled at the time it was filed. We reverse and…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Science Spectrum, Inc. v. MartinezTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Johnson v. Brewer & Pritchard, P.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. M.O. Dental Lab v. RapeTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Mathis v. LockwoodTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Jones v. Ray Insurance Agency, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API