Legal Opinion

State v. Adams

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 12, 2004No. D9906823T; A119362PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

The trial court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss a charge of driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII), concluding that the state had not complied with the statutory requirement to provide a speedy trial. ORS 135.747. We review for errors of law, State v. Hampton, 152 Or App 742, 744, 954 P2d 1267 (1998), and affirm.

On November 16, 1999, and again on November 21, 1999, defendant was arrested for DUII. He was arraigned on both DUII charges on December 20, 1999. On February 24, 2000, defendant made a demand for a speedy trial. On March 2, 2000, defendant rejected the state’s plea…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. IvoryOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. EmeryOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. State v. KirschCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. State v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. GarnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. State v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. State v. CoulsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  5. State v. SiegelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API