Legal Opinion

State v. Dixon

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 19, 2008No. 030695; A126880PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.

The state appeals an order dismissing charges of theft in the second degree and criminal mischief in the second degree against defendant for lack of a speedy trial under ORS 135.747. That statute allows dismissal of criminal proceedings when a defendant is “not brought to trial within a reasonable period of time.” The trial court concluded that, of the 21-month period of total delay from the initial indictment to the scheduled trial date, seven of those months were requested by defendant, and the remaining 14 months amounted to unreasonable delay. On review for errors of law, State v.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. EmeryOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. AdamsOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. DavidsOregon Supreme Court · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. LINH THAT CAM TONCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. State v. DoakCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. State v. WendtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. State v. BurketteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. State v. HallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API