Legal Opinion
State v. Peterson
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided September 11, 2002No. CR-00-02-08; A114510PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.
Defendant appeals from a conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants, assigning error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss on statutory and constitutional speedy trial grounds. We affirm.
On March 2, 2000, defendant was cited for driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII). The citation required him to appear for arraignment on April 5, but he did not do so. Instead, on April 14, he filed a motion to waive his appearance and entered a plea of not guilty. At a pretrial hearing on May 23, the court suggested a one-day trial for November 20, 2000. Through his…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Strunk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. IvoryOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. EmeryOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. MendeOregon Supreme Court · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- State v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- State v. DavidsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- State v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.