Legal Opinion

Hole v. National Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 8, 1927No. 26,986PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action was one to recover on an insurance policy covering farm property, consisting of a dwelling house, a barn, and certain personal property. The policy contained a provision that it became void if foreclosure proceedings were commenced. The defense was, foreclosure proceedings were commenced. Plaintiff recovered, and defendant appeals.

The case was tried on an agreed statement of facts which presents an unusual situation. The property was located in Finney county, and was mortgaged to the Warren Mortgage Company. The policy was issued…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Citizens State Bank v. Shawnee Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  2. Pettijohn v. Saint Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  3. Eikelberger v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  4. Fitzgibbons v. Merchants & Bankers Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  5. Butz v. Ohio Farmers' InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Peterson v. Hudson InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Bawden v. American Central InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1929
  4. Elmore v. Royal InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  5. Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API