Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Hudson Insurance

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1932No. Civil No. 3231PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

I. D. Peterson, hereinafter called plaintiff, brought suit against Hudson Insurance Company, a corporation, hereinafter called defendant, to recover on a certain policy of fire insurance issued by defendant in favor of plaintiff and covering certain property located in Maricopa county. The case was tried to the court sitting without a jury upon an agreed statement of facts, and, judgment being rendered in favor of defendant, this appeal was taken.

The question therefore presented is whether upon such an agreed statement of facts the court properly rendered the judgment which it did. This…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Titus v. . Glens Falls Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Quinlan v. Providence Washington InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Moore v. MeyersArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Gibson Electric Co. v. Liverpooland London & Globe InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  5. Smith v. Grange Mutual Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1926

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  2. D. M. A. F. B. Federal Credit Union v. Employers Mutual Liability InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Heard v. Farmers Insurance Exchange CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  4. Loomis v. Imperial Motors, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1964
  5. A. J. Bayless Markets, Inc. v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API