Legal Opinion
The State of Montana v. Eli Lilly and Company
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 5, 2025No. 2:23-cv-04214Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY IN RE: INSULIN PRICING LITIGATION Case No. 2:23-md-03080 (BRM)(LDW) MDL No. 3080 THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: OPINION The State of Montana, ex. rel. Austin Knudsen, Attorney General v. Eli Lilly and Company, et al. Case No. 2:23-cv-04214 MARTINOTTI, DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is Defendants UnitedHealth Group Incorporated’s (“UHG”) and OptumInsight, Inc.’s (“OptumInsight”) (together, “Moving Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss1 Plaintiff State of Montana’s (the “State”) First Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 2:23-cv-04214,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Walden v. FioreSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.