Legal Opinion

Hackett v. Western Express, Inc.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 23, 2011No. Docket: WCB-10-330PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGorman, J.

[¶ 1] Scott Hackett appeals from a decision of a Workers’ Compensation Board hearing officer (Stovall, HO) awarding him incapacity benefits for an injury incurred while working as a truck driver for Western Express, Inc. When calculating average weekly wage, the hearing officer excluded the nine cents per mile Hackett received as “per diem pay,” concluding that it was paid to cover “special expenses,” which, pursuant to 39-A M.R.S. § 102(4)(F) (2010), are not to be included in average weekly wage. We affirm the hearing officer’s decision on this issue, but remand for a recalculation of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clukey v. Piscataquis County Sheriff's DepartmentSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
  2. St. Mary's Regional Medical Center v. Bath Iron WorksSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bailey v. City of LewistonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  2. Fay E. Johnson v. The Home Depot USA, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  3. R.L. Turner Corporation v. William WressellIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Bailey v. City of LewistonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  5. Bailey v. City of LewistonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API