Legal Opinion

Donselman v. Mulligan

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 3, 1923No. 4669Published

1Opinion of the CourtVickery, J.

Epitomized Opinion

Published Only in Ohio Law Abstract

Original action in the Common Pleas brought by Elizabeth Donselmjan, plaintiff, to recover money spent in the support of her child whose father she alleged to be defendant, Dr. J. E. Mulligan. In 1901 plaintiff mar-ride a man named Clark, but never cohabited with him. About a year later she gave birth to the child in question who was 19 years old *203when this action was commenced. No previous action was ever brought‘against defendant, Mulligan, either under the bastard statute ’ or the criminal statute. To help establish that defendant was the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sieg v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API