Legal Opinion
Real Estate Board of Metropolitan St. Louis v. City of Jennings
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided March 26, 1991No. Nos. 57923, 57944PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CRANDALL, Chief Judge.
Defendants, City of Jennings and City of Flordell Hills (hereinafter jointly referred to as Cities), enacted ordinances which restricted the size of real estate advertising signs posted in areas zoned residential. Plaintiff, Real Estate Board of Metropolitan St. Louis (Board), brought an action against Cities, seeking a declaration that Cities’ ordinances which determined the dimensions for real estate advertising signs violated Section 67.317, RSMo (1986) and were unenforceable. The trial court found that the size restrictions contained within Cities’ ordinances were…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- City of Ladue v. HornMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- Century 21-Mabel O. Pettus, Inc. v. City of JenningsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
- City of Blue Springs v. GregoryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Deutsch v. City of LadueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
3Cited by5 opinions
- Home Builders Ass'n of Greater St. Louis, Inc. v. City of WildwoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Schnuck Markets, Inc. v. City of BridgetonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Miller v. City of ManchesterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- City of Clarkson Valley v. JonesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- City of Dellwood v. LattimoreMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993