Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Territory of Oklahoma

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 11, 1899PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Error from the District Court of Washita County; heforc John C. Tarsney, District Judge. James Hughes was convicted of cattle stealing and appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Burwell, J.:

James Hughes was indicted, tried, and convicted in the dictrict court of Washita county for the crime of stealing a cow, and was sentenced to- serve a term in the territorial penitentiary. From this judgment and sentence he appealed to this court, and prays a reversal on account of alleged errors in the instructions.

Thé first instruction that we will consider is as follows: “The law presumes every man to be innocent, when accused of crime, until his guilt is made to appear, to the satisfaction of the jury, by competent evidence, beyond a reasonable doubt;…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Roberts v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  2. People v. ScottMichigan Supreme Court · 1859
  3. People v. SotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Mitchell v. the Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
  5. State v. ArnoldNebraska Supreme Court · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. MartinezIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Bd. of Com'rs of Creek v. Alexander, St. TreasurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Shires v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Sheehan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1946
  5. Crowell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API