Legal Opinion

Flavan v. Cundiff

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 14, 2002No. ED 79834PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARY R. RUSSELL, Judge.

David Flavan (“Client”) appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Ellsworth Cundiff (“Attorney”) and Cundiff, Turken, and Londoff, LLP (“Firm”). Attorney and Firm unsuccessfully defended Client in an action filed against him by James D. Lundstrom and John Kanas to recover sales commission for the sale of Client’s riverboat. Client then brought a malpractice suit against Attorney and Firm, claiming Attorney was negligent in several respects in Client’s defense. The trial court granted Attorney and Firm’s motion for summary judgment, and Client now…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Thummel v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  3. Klemme v. BestSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  4. Charles Reinhart Co. v. WiniemkoMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Chocktoot v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Trujillo, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2005
  2. Roberts v. SokolMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Lauck v. PriceMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Alvin Valadez, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2015
  5. PHC-Minden, L.P. D/B/A Minden Medical Center v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API