State v. Colosimo
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Douglas, J.:
In this appeal, we consider the constitutionality of NRS 201.560, Nevada’s statute criminalizing the use of technology to lure children away from their parents or guardians. We also consider whether the district court’s dismissal of the indictment against respondent, Anthony John Colosimo, was proper. We conclude that the statute is constitutional; we also affirm the district court’s dismissal of the indictment against respondent based on a lack of evidence that he committed the crime charged.
FACTS
Respondent Anthony Colosimo corresponded through the Internet…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Edgar v. Mite Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Jeffrey MeekCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ex parte IngramCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Nelson v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. GallegosUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. RungNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
- Ex Parte Oscar Calvin Fisher, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.