Legal Opinion

Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. Harvey

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1938No. 2059PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kimball, Justice.

Charles E. Harvey, a workman employed by Stano-lind Oil and Gas Company, hereinafter called the “company,” was awarded compensation for temporary total disability under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, and the company by proceeding in error brings the case here for review.

The workman had been employed by the company as a roustabout since April, 1932. He was injured July 15, 1936, while assisting in laying a six-inch pipe for a water line. The facts in regard to the accident were not in dispute. A rope around a pipe broke while the workman was lifting on one end of a pick which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. ScullionWyoming Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Kittleson v. HiblerWyoming Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Gidley v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Gorral v. William H. Hamlyn & SonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1915

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Fox Park Timber Co. v. BakerWyoming Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Black Watch Farms v. BaldwinWyoming Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Vaughan v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation Division v. BergeronWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Kilburn Tire v. MeredithWyoming Supreme Court · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API