Legal Opinion

Dunaway v. Anderson

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 17, 1913No. Civ. No. 1123Published

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

Defendants, August Anderson and Alfred J. Anderson, in addition to their answer to the complaint, filed a cross-complaint and were awarded judgment thereon against plaintiff and the Madeline Land and Irrigation Company (a corporation), the latter having been made a defendant in the cross-complaint, for the sum of $1,242. The appeal is by plaintiff from the order denying his motion for a new trial and he states, in his opening brief, that “the propositions we submit herein are (1) The insufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment and findings thereon against T. F. Dunaway, plaintiff…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Green v. SouleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Estate of FayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Bundy v. Sierra Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Ripperdan v. WeldyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Humboldt Savings & Loan Society v. DowdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API