Legal Opinion

State v. Tucker

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1926No. 19546. Department TwoPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.

The appellant was found guilty of possessing intoxicating liquor and has appealed.

The most important point on this appeal is raised by the appellant’s plea of autrefois acquit. This prosecution was under a state statute, and it appears from the record that previously the appellant had been charged by a complaint in the police court of the city of Everett with the possession of intoxicating liquor, being the exact liquor which he, in the information, is charged with having possessed, and both the complaint and information relate to the same time and concededly cover the same incident. Upon the…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Grafton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. State v. GibbonsWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  3. People v. HanrahanMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. McInerney v. City of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
  5. State v. Lytle.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Waller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. RoybalWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  3. City of Bellingham v. SchamperaWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  4. United States v. FarwellDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1948
  5. Miller v. HansenOregon Supreme Court · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API